Moderate-to-late premature babies face higher rates of developmental problems
Moderate-to-late premature babies face much higher rates of developmental and behavioural delays than previously thought, an Australian-first longitudinal study by the Royal Women’s Hospital has found.
Published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Pediatrics today, the La Prem study is the first time Australian researchers have investigated the long-term health and development of premature babies born between 32 and 36 weeks. Clinicians assessed the babies while in the hospital and followed them up at two years of age, and together with a psychologist assessed the children’s health, cognitive and behavioural development.
Researchers found that compared with full term (37 weeks-plus) healthy babies, babies born moderately-to-late preterm were:
- three times more likely to have delays in their language and motor skills development
- twice as likely to have delays in cognitive development such as ability to perform tasks and follow directions
- more likely to have difficulty coping in different social settings
Associate Professor Jeanie Cheong, who led the research, said the findings were important as traditionally it had been thought that moderate-to-late premature babies did not experience significant long-term problems associated with premature birth.
“While not all moderate-to-late preterm babies experience problems, with 21,000 children born between 32 and 36 weeks in Australia each year, even a small percentage of affected children will have significant implications for both healthcare and educational providers,” Assoc. Prof. Cheong said.
“This research can assist parents in understanding why their child may be facing some additional challenges. But it is key that we undertake further research to understand whether these delays persist into school age and what early assistance can be provided to allow these premature babies to catch up to their peers.”
Assoc. Prof. Cheong said the research highlighted the importance of obstetricians working with women to delay delivery, where possible, until past 37 weeks.
“While it is not always possible to delay birth, it should be a factor in deciding the risks versus benefits for mother and baby health,” she said.
She said most research to date had focussed on very preterm babies born before 32 weeks gestation.
“We previously thought it was just those very early babies that had long-term problems but this, and a growing body of international research, helps us understand the longer term development and behavioural challenges that are experienced at much higher rates in the moderate-to-late premature babies as well.”
Assoc. Prof. Cheong and her team followed 200 premature babies born between 32 and 36 weeks, taking brain MRI scans on their full term date and following up at age two to assess their physical health and cognitive and behavioural development.
First time mother Sophie Logie gave birth to baby Elliot at the Women's at 32 weeks gestation. Elliot is now eight months old. Like all mums, Sophie is comparing his development to other babies the same age and he seems to be on target.
"This research doesn’t mean that all premature babies will have delays. But if Elliot does, it means that we can get interventions early. It is a good thing in my mind to know potentially what lies ahead.”
Working in partnership with the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Assoc. Prof. Cheong’s team found that brain MRI scans taken of premature babies, at what would have been around 40 weeks gestation, showed that brains were smaller on average than those babies born after 37 weeks. View that paper here.
“Smaller brains at birth are associated with poorer cognitive and behavioural development, however we cannot yet predict how an individual child will develop based on those scans,” she said.
Assoc. Prof. Cheong is seeking funding to assess the children in the study at eight years of age to understand whether the development delays persist and what impact their premature birth may have had on their schooling and social development. If you would like to help make this next phase of reseach possible, please donate to our "newborn intensive care' fund here.
Previous international studies have either been retrospective, relied on parental surveys, had a poor follow up rate or had limited face-to-face clinical assessment. However, all had pointed to development problems. The Women’s study had a 98.5 per cent follow up rate at two years of age and relied on clinical assessment rather than parental surveys which are at risk of parental bias.
This research was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and supported by the Royal Children’s Hospital’s Foundation and the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.
For more information contact Krista Eleftheriou on (03) 8345 2028 or Michelle Carnovale on (03) 8345 2921.